Appendix A
中文版
Download
softcopy (62KB)
|
Australia |
Canada |
New Zealand |
Singapore |
United Kingdom |
General Observation |
Commonly adopted pay policies, structures and systems |
||||||
Is pay administration devolved -
- for Civil Servants (see Note)? |
Substantially devolved �V departments and agencies largely determine own pay policies within guidelines
|
No �V pay policy remains largely centrally determined (this is currently under review) |
Highly devolved �V departments and agencies largely determine own pay policies within guidelines |
Moderate devolution �Vsome local flexibility; central agencies remain influential |
Highly devolved �V departments and agencies largely determine pay policies within guidelines
|
Devolvement of responsibility for pay management issues is a key thrust. Senior civil servants continue to be managed from a central point to facilitate mobility and pay control |
- for Senior Civil
|
No - determined centrally |
No - determined centrally |
No - determined centrally |
No - determined centrally |
No - determined centrally |
|
Are Disciplined Services handled separately for pay purposes? |
Customs & Excise and Immigration treated similarly to other civil servants. Fire, Correctional and most Police Services are outside core civil service
|
Immigration, Police, Flying and Correctional Services are treated similarly to other civil servants. Fire and Customs & Excise are outside core civil service |
Customs & Excise, Immigration, Police and Correctional Services are treated similarly to other civil servants. Fire Services are outside the core civil service |
All Disciplined Service equivalents are treated broadly similar to other civil servants, although some specific arrangements apply
|
Customs & Excise and Immigration are treated similarly to other civil servants. Correctional Services have separate arrangements. Fire and Police are outside core civil service. |
There is a wide span of arrangements for this group influenced by factors such as their legal ability to strike, need for independence, job demands & historical agreements |
Are pay adjustments made by formal comparability with private sector pay?
|
No �V seen only as a guide to reflect market conditions |
Yes - comparison by occupation |
No �V seen only as a guide to reflect market conditions |
Yes - competitiveness with the private sector for all jobs is seen as key to the recruitment and retention of high calibre staff
|
No �V seen only as a guide to support the principle of recruit, retain and motivate. |
Most countries have reduced their emphasis on formal pay comparability with the private sector with affordability considerations now taking precedence |
Is ��ability to pay�� a primary factor for pay adjustment? |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Are educational/academic qualifications an important factor for internal relativity? |
Only one of several factors |
Only one of several factors |
Only one of several factors |
Yes |
Only one of several factors |
Broader job comparisons are increasingly the norm |
Have allowances been rationalised/consolidated/ simplified?
|
Yes �V most allowances have ended and/or consolidated into base pay
|
Yes �V most allowances have ended and/or consolidated into base pay
|
Yes �V most allowances have ended and/or consolidated into base pay
|
Yes �V most allowances have ended and/or consolidated into base pay
|
Yes �V most allowances have ended and/or consolidated into base pay
|
In all cases, use of allowances has been reduced to increase transparency and reduce admin costs |
Experience of replacing fixed pay scales with pay ranges |
||||||
Have automatic annual increments on a pay scale been replaced by more flexible pay ranges?
|
Yes �V most staff are now on a flexible pay range |
Not for the majority of unionised staff, although a new scheme is currently being implemented. Pay ranges have been introduced for senior (non-unionised) civil servants |
Yes �V most staff are now on a flexible pay range |
The majority of staff still receive an annual increment but pay ranges have been established for senior civil servants |
Yes (with limited exceptions eg the Correctional Services).
|
General trend towards flexible pay ranges, particularly for senior staff |
|
Australia |
Canada |
New Zealand |
Singapore |
United Kingdom |
General Observation |
|
Systems and mechanisms for pay adjustments |
�@ | ||||||
Is a formal private sector comparison used to work out pay adjustments? |
No - but adjustments must be within an agreed financial budget |
No �V but emphasis on comparability and must be within agreed budget |
No - but adjustments must be within an agreed financial budget |
Yes �V calculated as a comparator to private sector pay |
No - but adjustments must be within an agreed financial budget |
The trend is towards a less mechanistic way of determining pay increases which allows agencies to address their individual needs, whilst operating within a broad centrally determined framework |
|
What is the main role of central agencies in pay determination?
- to
agree or to set increases? |
Agree overall financial budgets |
Strong central role in both budgets and detailed pay adjustments |
Agree overall financial budgets |
Determine overall financial budgets |
Agree overall financial budgets |
||
- to
provide advice and
|
To provide advice and guidance |
To set direction and determine broader pay policies |
To provide advice and guidance and set parameters |
To set direction and determine broader pay policies |
To provide advice and guidance and agree negotiating parameters |
|
|
Experience of introducing performance-based rewards |
|
||||||
Is there widespread use of performance related pay (PRP)?
|
Yes �V most staff have some form of PRP |
Minimal �V for a small number of senior civil servants up to 20% of pay may be ��at risk�� |
Yes �V most staff are eligible for some form of PRP |
Increasing - linked to performance of the individual and the economy as a whole |
Yes �V most staff are eligible for some form of PRP |
PRP is now widely used, particularly for senior staff |
|
Are performance awards consolidated into base pay?
|
Yes for some staff |
Yes, for some staff |
Yes, increasingly for most staff |
Yes for some staff |
Yes for most staff |
|
|
Is it paid as a one-off (non-consolidated) bonus?
|
Yes for some staff |
Limited to senior civil servants |
Yes for some staff |
Yes for some staff |
Use of bonuses limited to exceptional circumstances |
|
|
Are there team-based performance rewards? |
Some use �V typically paid on completion of a project
|
Very limited |
Very limited �V bonuses typically paid on completion of project |
Very limited |
Limited �V still seen as experimental. |
Whilst the broad principle is generally embraced there have yet to emerge significant numbers of successful examples |
|
Has a robust performance management framework been developed? |
Most forms of appraisal are used and increasingly 360 degree assessment. Skills development is ongoing. |
Traditional approach to appraisal for most staff with lack of consistent standards |
Well established systems and high skills level - self appraisal and 360 degree assessment are common. Reports are structured around competencies. |
Traditional but rigorous system. Recent emphasis on development of balanced scorecard approach |
Most forms of appraisal are used and increasingly 360 degree assessment. Skills development ongoing. |
A key component to support performance related pay but requires significant education and skills development to engineer behavioural change |
|
Experience of simplifying and decentralising pay and grading administration |
|
||||||
Have there been moves to establish flatter, less hierarchical structures through simplification of pay and grading systems? |
Yes - only 11 grades in the Australian Public Service |
This is on-going. The current system is highly complex with 72 occupation groups, 105 sub groups and 840 separate levels |
Yes �Vmost Departments and Agencies have independently introduced flatter and more flexible structures with fewer ranks/bands |
Some simplification in recent years, particularly amalgamation of pay bands at senior levels
|
Yes �V most Departments and Agencies have independently introduced flatter and more flexible structures with fewer ranks/bands |
In all cases there is a drive towards less complex pay and grading systems aimed at increasing flexibility at the department/agency level |
|
Is a formal job evaluation system used? |
Yes, to some degree. Each group of duties is classified according to its work value requirements |
Yes, an off-the-shelf system is used for executives. For other positions, whole job comparison is used and grouped by occupations |
Yes, either a position-based comparative job survey is used or an off- the-shelf system where there is no comparator role. |
Yes, to some degree |
Yes �V a civil service wide grading system is in operation |
The trend is towards broad, generic occupational groupings and a move away from narrowly defined job descriptions |
|
Note: the definition of civil servants may vary from one country to another.
�@